在輸(shu)配(pei)電(dian)(dian)價(jia)試點(dian)過程中，應注重與(yu)監(jian)(jian)管(guan)(guan)需求(qiu)相匹配(pei)的(de)監(jian)(jian)管(guan)(guan)能力建設(she)，在監(jian)(jian)管(guan)(guan)機(ji)構、人員編(bian)制(zhi)、經費保(bao)障等方(fang)面予以統籌考慮(lv)，確(que)保(bao)電(dian)(dian)力監(jian)(jian)管(guan)(guan)機(ji)構立場的(de)中立性;可在具備條件的(de)地(di)區探(tan)索開展輸(shu)配(pei)電(dian)(dian)成本(ben)激勵性監(jian)(jian)管(guan)(guan)試點(dian);有必要探(tan)索建立電(dian)(dian)網投資(zi)“準生(sheng)證”制(zhi)度，明確(que)允(yun)許進入輸(shu)配(pei)電(dian)(dian)成本(ben)的(de)投資(zi)標準，將對電(dian)(dian)網投資(zi)的(de)監(jian)(jian)審納入監(jian)(jian)管(guan)(guan)職能

　　輸(shu)配(pei)電價改革就(jiu)是要(yao)打破現行的(de)(de)(de)(de)“獨(du)買”和“獨(du)賣”模式，對電網(wang)服(fu)務實行“成(cheng)(cheng)本(ben)(ben)加成(cheng)(cheng)”定(ding)價，目的(de)(de)(de)(de)在于建(jian)立規則明晰、價格合理、監(jian)管有力、科學透明的(de)(de)(de)(de)獨(du)立輸(shu)配(pei)電價體(ti)(ti)系(xi)，讓(rang)輸(shu)配(pei)電價真實反映電網(wang)成(cheng)(cheng)本(ben)(ben)，形(xing)成(cheng)(cheng)主要(yao)由(you)市場決定(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)電力價格。在這個過程中(zhong)，要(yao)切實轉變政府(fu)對能源的(de)(de)(de)(de)監(jian)管方式，探索符合實際的(de)(de)(de)(de)監(jian)管手段，建(jian)立對電網(wang)企業成(cheng)(cheng)本(ben)(ben)和投資監(jian)管的(de)(de)(de)(de)體(ti)(ti)制機制。具(ju)體(ti)(ti)來說，要(yao)做好以下(xia)幾方面的(de)(de)(de)(de)工作。

　　首先，大力(li)(li)(li)加(jia)(jia)強(qiang)輸(shu)配(pei)電(dian)(dian)監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)能(neng)力(li)(li)(li)建(jian)(jian)設。盡(jin)管(guan)“成(cheng)本加(jia)(jia)成(cheng)”的定價(jia)模式有利(li)(li)于(yu)增(zeng)強(qiang)電(dian)(dian)網(wang)企(qi)業(ye)的成(cheng)本觀念，但(dan)如果沒有強(qiang)大有效(xiao)的監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)，電(dian)(dian)網(wang)企(qi)業(ye)的投(tou)資(zi)(zi)、運營成(cheng)本及可能(neng)產生的利(li)(li)益輸(shu)送問題(ti)就難(nan)以(yi)解(jie)決，企(qi)業(ye)仍然容易出現過(guo)度投(tou)資(zi)(zi)和要素(su)結構(gou)(gou)(gou)扭(niu)曲，最終影響成(cheng)本和電(dian)(dian)力(li)(li)(li)價(jia)格(ge)。因此，必(bi)須加(jia)(jia)強(qiang)輸(shu)配(pei)電(dian)(dian)監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)能(neng)力(li)(li)(li)建(jian)(jian)設，在輸(shu)配(pei)電(dian)(dian)價(jia)試點過(guo)程中，應(ying)注重(zhong)與(yu)監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)需求相匹配(pei)的監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)能(neng)力(li)(li)(li)建(jian)(jian)設，在監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)、人員編(bian)制、經(jing)費(fei)保障(zhang)等方面予以(yi)統籌考慮，確(que)保電(dian)(dian)力(li)(li)(li)監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)立場的中立性。與(yu)此同(tong)時，不妨擴充輸(shu)配(pei)電(dian)(dian)監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)隊伍規模，優化(hua)監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)機構(gou)(gou)(gou)人員結構(gou)(gou)(gou)，提(ti)高電(dian)(dian)力(li)(li)(li)監(jian)(jian)(jian)管(guan)的專(zhuan)業(ye)化(hua)水平。

　　其次，開(kai)展輸(shu)配電(dian)(dian)成本激(ji)勵性(xing)監(jian)管(guan)試點(dian)。由于電(dian)(dian)力生產或輸(shu)配企業與(yu)電(dian)(dian)力價(jia)(jia)格(ge)監(jian)管(guan)部門(men)之間信息不對稱(cheng)，電(dian)(dian)力成本核算和監(jian)審面臨重大挑戰(zhan)。從國際經(jing)驗看(kan)，“成本加成”定(ding)(ding)價(jia)(jia)法下，電(dian)(dian)力企業容易產生上下游利益輸(shu)送等(deng)問題(ti)。我(wo)國地區間電(dian)(dian)網(wang)建(jian)設步伐不一致(zhi)，對電(dian)(dian)網(wang)投資的需求也存(cun)在差(cha)異，先在具備條件(jian)的地區探索開(kai)展輸(shu)配電(dian)(dian)成本激(ji)勵性(xing)監(jian)管(guan)試點(dian)切實(shi)(shi)可(ke)行(xing)。比如，規定(ding)(ding)電(dian)(dian)網(wang)輸(shu)配電(dian)(dian)成本或價(jia)(jia)格(ge)每(mei)年降低(di)固(gu)定(ding)(ding)百分點(dian)，連續降低(di)若干年;探索實(shi)(shi)行(xing)各(ge)區域、省級電(dian)(dian)網(wang)間“對標(biao)”管(guan)理(li)，以監(jian)管(guan)試點(dian)為標(biao)桿制定(ding)(ding)“領(ling)跑者”輸(shu)配電(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)標(biao)準等(deng)。

　　再次，探索(suo)建立(li)電(dian)(dian)(dian)網投(tou)資“準生證(zheng)”制(zhi)度。電(dian)(dian)(dian)網輸(shu)(shu)配電(dian)(dian)(dian)價格(ge)監(jian)審(shen)屬于事前監(jian)管(guan)，有效資產、準許(xu)收入(ru)、準入(ru)收益依賴于對監(jian)管(guan)期(qi)內投(tou)資、電(dian)(dian)(dian)量的預測。也(ye)就是說，未來輸(shu)(shu)配電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本的高低(di)在(zai)很大程(cheng)度上取(qu)決于當前的投(tou)資決策。為(wei)此，有必要探索(suo)建立(li)電(dian)(dian)(dian)網投(tou)資“準生證(zheng)”制(zhi)度，明確允許(xu)進入(ru)輸(shu)(shu)配電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本的投(tou)資標(biao)準，將對電(dian)(dian)(dian)網投(tou)資的監(jian)審(shen)納入(ru)監(jian)管(guan)職能，重點審(shen)查電(dian)(dian)(dian)網投(tou)資是否符合國家電(dian)(dian)(dian)力規劃、是否具備(bei)進入(ru)輸(shu)(shu)配電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本的條件，確保(bao)監(jian)審(shen)機構的獨(du)立(li)性(xing)和(he)專業(ye)性(xing)。

　　第四，建立電(dian)網非輸(shu)(shu)配(pei)電(dian)資產剝離機制(zhi)。在改革輸(shu)(shu)配(pei)電(dian)價形成(cheng)機制(zhi)的(de)(de)過(guo)程中，電(dian)網企(qi)業(ye)(ye)輸(shu)(shu)配(pei)電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)的(de)(de)界定標準逐漸明確，與輸(shu)(shu)配(pei)電(dian)不相關(guan)的(de)(de)電(dian)網資產需要從電(dian)網企(qi)業(ye)(ye)剝離。為此，要完善輸(shu)(shu)配(pei)電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)核算制(zhi)度(du)、嚴格(ge)輸(shu)(shu)配(pei)電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)監審制(zhi)度(du)，減少可能發生的(de)(de)“利益輸(shu)(shu)送”。

　　由(you)于我國電(dian)(dian)力價格承擔(dan)著保(bao)民生的(de)(de)公共職能(neng)，輸(shu)配電(dian)(dian)價改革應合理安(an)排政府(fu)的(de)(de)政策目(mu)標，逐(zhu)步減少和妥善處理交叉補貼，確保(bao)電(dian)(dian)網(wang)投資(zi)不影響普遍(bian)服(fu)務功能(neng)的(de)(de)發揮。更(geng)多最新數據分析(xi)、市(shi)場分析(xi)報告、市(shi)場調研(yan)、行業分析(xi)，請(qing)訪問。